Both results again bested the Core i9-7900X's 91fps on the same test. Paul Alcorn, And our POV-Ray "All CPUs" result went from 54 seconds at stock to 50 seconds—again, a change of about 7 percent for the better. And if you really need more performance from your high-end chip in heavily threaded tasks, you should probably just shell out the extra $200 or so for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, and run it at stock. Core i7-7700K also does well out of the box, managing to outpace the brawnier stock Threadripper models. And compared to the current-generation 10-core Core i9-7900X, the Threadripper 1920X did about 13 percent better while selling for $200 less. The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a 12 core 24 thread CPU, currently second only to the 1950X (16 cores, 32 threads) in AMD’s latest Zen-based line for high end desktop processors. Shares. Our expert industry analysis and practical solutions help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology. This was a great article. You will save $200, though, because the Threadripper 1920X is priced at $799, while the 1950X rings up at $999. And the modules are connected via the same "Infinity Fabric" that AMD uses to connect the modules inside lesser Ryzen chips. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time. Let's dig in. That one is Intel's original 10-core consumer chip, which debuted in May of 2016 and (somehow!) AMD … A couple of things are impressive here from the specs alone. That said, as soon as you start moving down the pricing ladder, the current cost of compatible motherboards becomes more of an issue. Tom's Hardware is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. If you're one of them, your chips are here. Napomena: Prikazani rezultati za Ryzen Threadripper 1920X … Intel’s chip is a formidable competitor with the same two core boost clock speed of 4.5 Ghz as its 10 core i9-7900X brother. AMD Socket AM4 Workstation AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X, 1600X, 1500X MSI X370 Tomahawk 4x 8 GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 There is, after all, a pretty big gulf between 20 threads and the Threadripper 1950X's 32 threads. Wildly extreme 32-thread performance, for the same price as Intel's new 20-thread Core X-Series CPU. And you'll need a robust cooler (preferably a self-contained liquid model, though an air cooler is an option) to keep Threadripper chilled—especially if you intend to overclock. Just factor in the high cost of motherboards and cooling into your build budget. Both Skylake-X-based processors fall to the bottom of our chart in their stock configuration, which doesn't make sense given superior host processing resources. And most recently, AMD's high-end Ryzen Threadripper platform has topped out at 32-thread capability with the $999-MSRP AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. The company argues that if you're spending this much on a processor and platform, you should probably be pushing more pixels on a higher-resolution monitor. AMD went out of its way in its reviewer's guide it sent along with the Threadripper chips to state "the AMD Ryzen Threadripper processor was not designed for or intended to run games at the 1,920x1,080 resolution." For serious Enthusiasts, Prosumers and Creators, AMD designed the new 2nd Gen Ryzen™ Threadripper™ 2920X. Written by Antony Leather August 10, 2017 | 14:01. Considering there aren't a whole lot of time-consuming tasks in computing that are still limited to single computing core or thread, we're chalking AMD's showing here to "good enough." Game Mode disables a number of cores (the amount depends on the chip) and tweaks the RAM performance to favor gaming. Interestingly, the two Threadripper chips were effectively tied on the single-core test. To see how well the stepped-down Ryzen Threadripper 1920X handles gaming, we swapped that chip into our test bed and ran the same games that we used to test other recent processors. What they had done is disable SMT and have a 16c/16t CPU instead of the 8c/16t that AMD's game mode does. But this test clearly favors fewer cores and faster clocks (and less latency), as the mainstream quad-core Core i7-7700K delivered a much higher 130fps at 1080p on the same test with the same card. In this last CPU test, the Threadripper 1920X again took the lead over the Core i9-7900X, although the difference was only about 4 percent. Using the same settings as we used for the Threadripper 1950X (that is, setting the voltage at a rather high 1.325 volts, which was expressly suggested by AMD), we were able to get the Threadripper 1920X stable with all cores clocked at 4GHz, 500MHz above the 3.5GHz base clock. PSU: Cooler Master V1200 Platinum . Additionally, Epyc includes a two-socket option, making possible systems with a crazy-to-imagine 128 threads in a single system. Along with the usual test that makes use of all available cores, we've added the single-core results here to get a sense of how AMD's new chip fares in lightly threaded workloads. That said, with Nvidia's current-generation graphics cards limited to just a pair in SLI, and current speedy storage drives eating up just four lanes, it's tough to see how even the most well-heeled of PC enthusiasts will make any kind of practical use of all that PCI Express bandwidth. But we'll have to wait for Intel's even higher-end Core i9 chips to arrive for the Threadripper 1950X to have any real competition on tasks that gobble up cores and threads. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count. Here's a detailed look at the specs of the the two chips that are available today, direct from AMD... As noted earlier, the company also has in the pipeline an eight-core "entry-level" Ryzen Threadripper 1900X that will list for $549, with a high 3.8GHz base clock and the same 4GHz top clock as the other two chips. Tags: #amd-zen #ryzen #socket-tr4 #threadripper #tr4 #x399. Given the mostly sub-10-percent difference between the two modes, unless you're a frame-rate stickler, you may want to just leave Creator Mode enabled, especially since you need to reboot when switching between modes. But we're sure some enthusiasts out there with a craving for CrossFire and fast RAID-enabled PCI Express storage have already figured it out on paper. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count. The lowest-end of those, the Intel Core i5-7640X, offers just 16 PCI Express lanes, though it, admittedly, costs half as much as the Threadripper 1900X will. Apple M1 8x 3.20 GHz: 0 (0%) AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 12x 3.50 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT: 406 (100%) Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core) Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Not that this is a major issue, but it's tough to ignore in a brand-new platform when Intel's competing chips are far smaller and aren't as obviously separate modules paired together. That's a lot of extra dosh to pay for a couple of extra cores. We're still not sure how all but the most well-heeled of hardware junkies are going to use all of those lanes. Matt is a self-described Net nerd, gadget geek, and general connoisseur of off-kilter culture. But as much as all of us might want access to all the computing cores and threads we can get, if only for bragging rights, how many of us can actually make any substantive use of the Threadripper 1950X's 16 cores, or the upcoming Intel Core i9-7980XE's 18 cores and 36 threads? Follow the Threads. Platform is overflowing with PCI Express lanes. Intel Core i5 vs. i7, How Fast Is Apple's M1 Chip? And that's to say nothing of the rumored upcoming six-core laptop processors from Intel. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Intel Core i3-3220: 19. At the 4GHz overclock, we saw our Cinebench multi-threaded score jump from 2,436 to 2,608 (a jump of about 7 percent). Compare this with the upcoming 18-core Intel Core i9-7980XE, which Intel has revealed will have a low 2.6GHz base clock. With the Ryzen 3, 5, and 7 chips, motherboard pricing has been another part of the value proposition, with X370, B350, and A320 boards generally coming in at either a lower price than Intel-based ones, or with more premium features (M.2 slots, LEDs, metal-wrapped PCIe x16 slots) than similarly priced Intel boards. That Intel "Extreme Edition" chip debuted at almost $1,000 more than the 1920X less than a year ago when we wrote this, and it's now trailing well behind not AMD's best chip, but the company's second-best Threadripper offering. We ran our two test games on both our Core X-Series testbed with the Core i9 chip, and our Threadripper testbed with the Threadripper 1920X. But at least at this early stage, that's not the case with Threadripper. Please refresh the page and try again. This is an impressive start for AMD's 12-core chip. All that said, remember that we were able to hit the 4GHz mark using the massive 360mm Thermaltake Floe Riing cooler we mentioned in our test-bed description., Hats-off to AMD and Intel. AMD has been long out of this league of enthusiast-class CPUs, and it shows in some obvious and not-so-obvious ways. Get Yours. AMD Socket SP3 (TR4) AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, 1920X Asis X399 ROG Zenith Extreme 4x 8 GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 Intel Socket 2066 Intel Core i9-7900X MSI X299 Gaming Pro Carbon AC. They are culled from the manufacturing process and set aside. AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 1700X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: 24. 16 cores provide an astonishing 32 threads of simultaneous multi-processing power, while 40MB of combined cache and vast I/O from the enthusiast-grade AMD X399 platform stand ready to feed the beast. It sticks reasonably close to the top-end 1950X chip on many tests, while consistently besting the competing Core i9-7900X on core-hungry benchmarks, all while selling for a couple of hundred bucks less than either of those options. We've listed the parts below. Last, we fired up the popular 7-Zip file-compression software and ran its built-in compression/decompression benchmark, which is another useful test of a CPU's multi-core abilities. Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition. Next, we switched to the game Far Cry Primal, on the title's High preset. Platform is overflowing with PCI Express lanes. Platform is overflowing with PCI Express lanes. For starters, the Threadripper chips are positively huge by CPU standards, at about 3.75 inches on the diagonal (or roughly 3 inches long by 2.25 inches across). AMD Ryzen Threadripper is an unashamed attempt to rip the performance legs off Intel's best consumer CPUs to date. The overclocked Intel processors lead, while AMD's Ryzen models populate the lower half of our chart. Handbrake, a commonly used tool for converting videos from one format to another, benefits from having lots of cores and threads at your disposal. Really, though, aside from the eight-core Ryzen 7 1800X, all the results here were very close. However, both the -7900X and -7700K do suffer significant frame time outliers. The 1900X has been promised to launch at the end of August 2017. And the new 10-core and 8-core Intel Core X-Series chips bested both the Threadripper chips, despite their more numerous cores and threads. For our formal comparisons, we also threw in the eight-core Core i7-7820X (also a Core X-Series chip), which we were in the process of reviewing. And while the 12-core 1920X didn't quite leave the Core i9-7900X eating silicon dust, the 1920X's showing is still impressive given the Intel competition costs about $200 more. The short answer is probably, although the same caveats about Threadripper remain with this chip. Not that physical chip size really matters in a desktop PC, but Intel's competing Core X-Series chips measure about 2 inches by 1.75 inches, and the Ryzen chips are even smaller. Clearly, though, if you're doing lots of video editing, crunching through things like 4K video in a time-sensitive professional environment, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X may be worth paying an extra $200 for. This year, first there was the eight-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 chips that made their debut in March. (Again, as we mentioned earlier, we had to switch to Game Mode and reboot to get the Threadripper system to launch the game at all.) Both systems were equipped with 32GB of RAM running at 3,200MHz, using the motherboards' built-in XMP profiles. The physical characteristics of the Epyc and Threadripper chips are either identical or nearly so. One of Threadripper's larger quirks is also down to physicality, of a different sort: its complex installation process. If you just want a general sense of how the platform shapes up in terms of modern features, you can get a pretty good sense by studying the diagram below, provided by AMD... One thing we will point out here is the fact that AMD provides 64 PCI Express lanes with all of its Ryzen Threadripper chips. That Core i9's top Turbo clock speed, 4.2GHz, will be higher than AMD's 4GHz, but lower than that of the mainstream Core i7-7700K, which can ramp as high as 4.5GHz without overclocking. But note that if you want the best possible gaming performance at or around 1080p resolution, you're better off with a chip with fewer cores and higher clocks, like the Core i7-7700K. The Threadripper models lead the Intel competition at stock and overclocked settings. This should make the upcoming Threadripper 1900X far more appealing as a lower-cost entry point to AMD's enthusiast platform than, say, Intel's own "entry-level" Core X-Series silicon, the so-called "Kaby Lake X" chips. Share this page . The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X Review Today is a critically important day for AMD. Creator Mode is enabled by default, and it offers the best performance for tackling tasks that like lots of threads. Also in our charts from Intel is the Core i7-6900K, a previous-generation eight-core chip that sells for around $1,000, about the same price as the top-end Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. But it's fair to say that, in part because Epyc is itself brand-new (the company just launched Epyc in June 2017), the Threadripper chips and platform aren't quite as refined as Intel's competing offerings are. The Asus ROG Zenith Extreme we used for testing was priced at $549. The 10-core Core i9-7900X should at least be in the same league as the Threadripper CPUs (for the most part). Does that make the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X the better buy between it and its higher-end AMD silicon sibling or, for that matter, a better one than the competing 10-core Intel Core i9-7900X, which is also about $1,000? We're not arguing with the logic of that, but the fact is: 1080p is still a wildly popular gaming resolution, and one that is also favored by competitive gamers with high-refresh-rate 1080p screens. That said, both the Threadripper and Core i9 chips deliver high enough frame rates to satisfy all but the most discerning high-fps game junkie. Then came Intel's Core X-Series/Core i9 response at Computex 2017 in June. But the underlying silicon in the individual modules is essentially the same, whether we're talking about mainstream Ryzen chips, Threadripper, or Epyc. It Depends on the App, Intel Optane SSD 900P Series (280GB) Review, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Founders Edition) Review. GPU: AMD Radeon RX VEGA 56. At 1080p in this benchmark, the Threadripper 1950X system managed an average of 103fps, while the 1920X interestingly jumped up to 108fps. Those numbers are about 1fps lower than what we saw when testing the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, and compare well to the Core i9-7900X, which delivered just 97fps on the same test with the same card. Your subscription has been confirmed. Here's a look at Threadripper bracketed by an ordinary Ryzen (to the left) and a Core X-Series (in the box at right). The award-winning Threadripper 1950X and Threadripper 1920X CPUs proved that AMD is serious about HEDT performance, and that disrupting the status quo still matters in the most elite PC segment. Meanwhile, Intel's Core i7-7820X suffers severe frame time variance that manifests as visible stuttering. On the whole, we found little not to like about the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. With all of this action in high-end desktop processors, 2017 may go down (in the minds of PC enthusiasts, at least) as the year of "more cores for the masses." All that said, a couple of the X399 motherboards already have mail-in rebates, indicating that pricing may fall soon after launch. But while AMD chips are substantially behind here, they don't get completely left behind. Thank you for signing up to Tom's Hardware. We then switched over to our venerable iTunes Conversion Test, using version 10.6 of iTunes. We open a standard test file (it's of a flying squirrel) and time how long the test processor takes to finish the render. Interestingly, though, Threadripper 1920X triumphs over the 1950X in yet another lightly threaded title. By Paul Alcorn, Igor Wallossek 30 August 2017. This is important because, as we've seen recently when testing both Intel and AMD chips, systems based around these recent CPUs tend to perform better when gaming at 1080p with faster-clocked RAM. Competing Intel chips are better at lightly threaded tasks. … The current pricing stack positions AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper 1920X up against Intel’s 8 core part the i7-7820X. Don't let us stop you now.). The result is a proprietary score indicating a PC's suitability for processor-intensive workloads. (We don't have an Epyc chip on hand to say for sure.) The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a 12 core 24 thread CPU, currently second only to the 1950X (16 cores, 32 threads) in AMD’s latest Zen-based line for high end desktop processors. Test: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X . Great review as always but on the power consumption fron given that the 1950x has six more cores and the 1920 has two more they are more power efficient than the 7900x is every regard relative to the high stock clocks of the TR, "Ryzen Threadripper 1920X comes arms with 12 physical cores and SMT", Your sister site Anandtech did a retest of Threadripper a while back and found that their original form of game mode was more effective than the one supplied by AMD. What does that tell us? The setup was powered by a (probably overkill) Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1200 power supply. First off, the lesser Threadripper chip did better than the 1950X here. It's AMD to the rescue again, though, as it stands to offer 12 cores for just £799 and 16 for £999 with the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X respectively. - AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950x - Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB (4x8GB) DDR4 DRAM 3000MHz C15 Desktop Memory Kit - Black (CMK16GX4M2B3000C15) - ASRock X399 Taichi sTR4 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.1/3.0 ATX AMD Motherboard - Cooler Master MAM-D7PN-DWRPS-T1 AMD Wraith Ripper - Samsung 970 EVO 2TB - NVMe PCIe M.2 2280 SSD - Advancing Gene NVMe M.2 SSD Cooler Heatsinks with … After that, again to get a sense of how the Core i9 handles single-core performance, we ran the same benchmark using the "One CPU" setting. The underlying architecture of Threadripper, Epyc, and the mainstream Ryzen chips is the same "Zen" design found in the initial Ryzen 7 chips. You can use Ryzen Master to tweak clocks and voltages from within Windows, versus the usual BIOS-level approach. Both of AMD's current Ryzen Threadripper chips feature 512K per-core of L2 cache (8MB total on the 1950X and 6MB on the 1920X), quad-channel memory controllers (2+2), … Given the already high 180-watt TDP of the Threadripper chips, we wouldn't expect to get high sustained overclocked speeds without a similar cooling solution. A graduate of the first class of the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism, his work has appeared in Popular Science, Consumer Reports, Smithsonian, and elsewhere in the ether. ), How to Free Up Space on Your iPhone or iPad, How to Save Money on Your Cell Phone Bill, How to Find Free Tools to Optimize Your Small Business, How to Get Started With Project Management, How to Build a Maxed-Out Intel Coffee Lake Gaming Rig, Report: Apple Is Testing a Chip Design With 32 High-Performance Cores, First Tests: AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper Pro, New Muscle in Workstation CPUs, Despite 7nm Struggle, Intel to Keep Investing in 5nm, 3nm Chip Technologies, Which CPU Should You Buy? AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Review. Current page: But on the multi-core test, the Threadripper 1920X absolutely destroys last year's Core i7-6950X—which debuted at almost twice the 1920X's $799 price! We stuck all those components into Mean:It's tempered-glass 5PM case, and used Thermaltake's new Floe Riing 360 RGB for CPU cooling. Enter the the $799-MSRP Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. As noted up top, Threadripper as a platform is powerful and complex, but the actual chip-install process is unlike anything we've seen before in the consumer-desktop realm. And on the plus side (albeit superficially), the retail packaging is unusually interesting. You'll often find him writing while walking on his treadmill desk, surrounded by heaps of consumer tech. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. At this point, the only thing "extreme" about the Core i7-6950X is its pricing. RAM: 32GB (8GB x 4) G.SKILL Trident-Z RGB DDR4-3200 MHz CL14. With X399 boards starting at about $100 more than entry-level Intel X299 offerings, the price advantage of this chip over a $1,000 Core i9 is effectively sliced in half. That's at least in part because Threadripper is pretty much a straight-up consumer-focused clone of the AMD's (also new) Epyc server line. It packs 12 cores and has the ability to handle up to 24 simultaneous threads, thanks to the company's Simultaneous Multi-threading Technology (SMT), which is similar to Intel's Hyper-Threading. But with Ryzen you get more PCIe lanes than even the 44 lanes on the top-end Intel Core i9-7980XE, which is expected to sell for around $2,000. By now, many enthusiasts know the story of AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ processors: powerful creative performance, smooth gaming, and an uncompromising platform with tons of ports and lanes. In other words, some games prefer more cores, while others prefer less latency. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Intel Xeon Gold 6146: 20. If video crunching or similar tasks aren't something you do all the time, or if you have the need but $799 is still a bit rich for you, you may want to wait a bit. But when we initially fired up the two test titles we use for CPU benchmarking (Far Cry Primal and Rise of the Tomb Raider) and ran them on the higher-end Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, we didn't see any worse performance than exhibited by the company's Ryzen 7 chips. Similarly to the 1950X, it has a base clock speed of 3.5 GHz (3.4 GHz for the 1950X) which can boost to a maximum of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes.